Does Performance of D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Change With the Virulence of Infecting Organism? BrowZine Journal Cover
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The impact of the organism virulence on diagnostic accuracy of D-Dimer for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is unknown. Our objective was to assess if the performance of D-Dimer in PJI diagnosis changes with the virulence of the organism(s).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 143 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties/total knee arthroplasties with D-Dimer ordered preoperatively. Operations were performed by 3 surgeons at a single institution (November 2017 through September 2020). There were 141 revisions with complete 2013-International Consensus Meeting-criteria initially included. This criteria was used to classify revisions as aseptic versus septic. Culture-negative septic revisions (n = 8) were excluded, and 133 revisions (47-hips/86-knees; 67-septic/66-aseptic) were analyzed. Based on culture results, septic-revisions were categorized into 'low-virulence (LV/n = 40)' or 'high-virulence (HV/n = 27)'. The D-Dimer threshold (850-ng/mL) was tested against 2013-International Consensus Meeting-criteria ("standard") in identifying septic-revisions (LV/HV) from aseptic-revisions. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values/negative predictive values (NPV) were determined. Receiver-operating-characteristic-curve-analyses were performed.
Results: Plasma D-Dimer showed high sensitivity (97.5%) and NPV (95.4%) in LV septic cases, which appeared to reduce by about 5% in HV septic cases (sensitivity = 92.5% and NPV = 91.3%). However, this marker had poor overall accuracy (LV = 57%; HV = 49.4%), low specificity (LV and HV = 31.8%), and positive predictive values (LV = 46.4%; HV = 35.7%) to diagnose PJI. The area under the curve was 0.647 and 0.622 in LV and HV versus aseptic revisions, respectively.
Conclusion: D-Dimer performs poorly to identify septic from aseptic revisions in the setting of LV/HV infecting organisms alike. However, it shows high sensitivity for PJI diagnosis in cases of LV organisms which might be missed by most diagnostic tests.
DOI
10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.022.
Publication Date
7-2023
Recommended Citation
Pannu, T. S., Villa, J. M., Jimenez, D. A., Riesgo, A. M., & Higuera, C. A. (2023). Does Performance of D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Change With the Virulence of Infecting Organism?. The Journal of arthroplasty, 38(7 Suppl 2), S389–S393.
Comments
Pannu, T. S., Villa, J. M., Jimenez, D. A., Riesgo, A. M., & Higuera, C. A. (2023). Does Performance of D-Dimer for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Change With the Virulence of Infecting Organism?. The Journal of arthroplasty, 38(7 Suppl 2), S389–S393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.022